Man vs. Himself Betrayal and Abandonment Shown in Arthur...

Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman tells the story of a man trying and failing to obtain success for him and his family. Willy Loman, a traveling salesman, has been trying to ‘make it big’ for the majority of his life. Miller’s play explores the themes of abandonment and betrayal and their effects on life’s success. Willy sees himself as being abandoned by his older brother, Ben, and constantly views his sibling’s betrayal as one that changed his prospects forever. Willy, in turn, is guilty of a different type of abandonment and betrayal of his sons, especially Biff. Willy first experiences abandonment through the actions of his brother, Ben Loman. In the first act, Willy sees Ben in his dream, â€Å"walking away down some open road; I†¦show more content†¦When Biff comes back home he is willing to meet with Bill Oliver, a man who can provide him with a job that will make Willy happy. Instead of obtaining this job and thus Will y’s dream, Biff steals from Bill Oliver and ends up not getting the job. Bill tries to explain to Willy later on that he cannot follow in his footsteps, finally telling him of the incident. Willy then feels betrayed by this and said, â€Å"You stole Bill Oliver’s pen!† with the shock leading him to leave the room (Miller 1606). Happy and Biff abandon their father in his anger and leave the restaurant with two call girls. As Willy comes to terms with what his life really is, he commits the last betrayal in abandoning his family. Choosing to leave his wife and children, in an attempt to rectify what he has done with their lives, Willy commits suicide. Miller shows the anger felt after the suicide through Happy, â€Å"He had no right to do that†¦We would’ve helped him† (Miller 1619). Willy betrays both himself and his family with his act of suicide, abandoning the world where he could never be successful. He was never satisfied with any of the people in his family, especially Biff. This is something Biff held against him, stating at his funeral â€Å"he had all the wrong dreams† (Miller 1619). Biff could not forgive his father for his greatest betrayal: not giving his son a chance. Willy never wanted to let Biff

How Socioeconomic Status Affects Cognitive Development of...

The development of children can depend on many factors, one of the important ones being socioeconomic status (SES). SES can be defined as a multidimensional construct, including measures of social factors such as power, prestige and hierarchical social status, and economic resources (Hackman and Farah, 2009). Child development can be studied from multiple dimensions such as physical, mental, social, and emotional development among others. For the purposes of this study, I will be focusing on how socioeconomic status affects child cognitive development. Cognitive development is the development of memory, reasoning, problem-solving and thinking abilities in a child. A UK based study about Socioeconomic Status and Children’s Intelligence†¦show more content†¦The study was strong in that, they used a twin study controlling the gene factor and properly studies the environment. They had a sample size of 8716 twins which a quite large sample size, representing the general pu blic. They were also able to study children of multiple ages which shows that the effects are constant regardless of age. Another study to study SES and cognitive development was done by Merete Osler1, Kirsten Avlund, and Erik Lykke Mortensen to examine the influence of social circumstances early in life on changes in cognitive function from young adulthood to middle age (2012). They looked at the impact of birth characteristics like birth weight and maternal age, childhood activities in leisure time, education and adult social class on the expected relationship. A sample of 11 532 men aged 12, 18, and 57 were assessed. To find the association of early-life characteristics with cognitive test scores, a linear regression was used. They found that the scores at age 57 years highly correlated with the scores at ages 12 and 18 years. Participants who had a father in the working class at birth were related to having lower cognitive function at all three ages. It was also found that a d ecline in cognitive function was present with low education, many social activities and minimum intellectual activities during childhood in leisure time and low adult social class. The strength of this study was that they used a large sample size, andShow MoreRelatedThe Health And Academic Performance Of Children887 Words   |  4 Pagesacademic/professional, socioeconomic backgrounds and many other attributes that contribute to diversity as a whole. As an educator you need to be fully aware of these differences among your students, so you can provide a classroom where the students are comfortable interacting with different people, ideas and backgrounds within the physical school environment. Diversity can contribute to the effects on the health and learning of children and my aim will be to narrow the selection to socioeconomic status (SES) onRead MoreEffects of Socioeconomic Status and Ethnicity on a Child1542 Words   |  7 PagesThe socioeconomic status of a family and their e thnicity has a substantial effect on their child’s early learning and determines how much their child will accomplish through life. Life events from before birth to three years old will have significant impact on brain development (Nelson, 1999). Socioeconomic status limits how much a family could provide to aid a child’s development. Middle-class families can better prepare their children with opportunities for success than families with low householdRead MoreThe Positive Effect of High Quality Childcare on Childrens Cognitive Development1452 Words   |  6 PagesCognitive development is defined as the growth and change in a person’s ability to perform mental tasks including thinking, understanding and reasoning (California Department of Education, 2014). Cognitive development is a process involving a complex interaction between biological and environmental factors (Feinstein, 2003, as cited in Wong, Edwards, 2013). There are multiple factors that occur in ea rly childhood including breastfeeding, parental intelligence and obstetric complications that haveRead MoreFactors That Influence Human Development1646 Words   |  7 PagesIn your own words, what role does socioeconomic status, cultural context, and ethnicity play in development (show examples of each)? In our day and time, socioeconomic status, cultural context, and ethnicity play a huge role in human development. Human development begins while in the womb and at birth and continues through life heavily depending on these particular factors. These factors determine how a person communicates, works, looks, and chooses to live their daily lives. People are individualsRead MoreThe Effects Of Video Games On The Development Of An Individual1659 Words   |  7 Pagesinfluence on the development of an individual. All of the research studies revolved around how external sources effected the development of a person. Each study focused on a different age and aspect of an individual’s surroundings. Article one â€Å"Infant Development Outcomes: A Family Systems Perspective† focused on the early stages of infancy; birth to seventeen months, and the effects of the individual mental status of each parent and the relationship of the parents on the infants cognitive and physic alRead MoreThe Process Of Ordinary Cognitive Development2257 Words   |  10 Pagesprocess of ordinary cognitive development has often been viewed as an independent, isolated progress due to inherent, individual, and identically produced growth. However, in current literature, there has been a growing consensus that socioeconomic status, and its subsequent resources, cannot be abstracted from the process or success of cognitive development. In one study, through the investigation of relationships between socioeconomic status and brain morphometry, socioeconomic disparities wereRead MoreThe Effects Of Stress From Socioeconomic Status And Postsecondary Educational Attainment1083 Words   |  5 Pages the effects of stress from socioeconomic status and postsecondary educational attainment. SAWAT PHANTHAVADY A Child cannot choose the life their born into. For some this means a life of poverty and uncertainty. This group is classified as having a low Socioeconomic Status (SES). Children are the once affected the most in this in this category. They are faced with negative caregivers, malnutrition, toxic environment and stress causing their brain structureRead MoreEffects Of Socioeconomic Status On Middle Childhood Essay1572 Words   |  7 PagesThe Effects of Socioeconomic Status from Birth to Middle Childhood Socioeconomic status is the driving force behind many aspects of life. In this essay I will touch on several ways in which it can impact areas of development both in the United States and other places around the world. The first area I would like to look at is Behavior. In the textbook chapter 2 discusses behavior genetics and heritability. It discusses the relationship between the genetic and the environmental influences usingRead MoreThe Equal Education System9443 Words   |  38 Pagesfrom this egalitarian system. Only 17% of Australians from low-socioeconomic backgrounds are able to attend university , roughly half the likelihood of Australians from medium and high socioeconomic backgrounds. This degree of socio-academic inequality has remained relatively stable for over a decade, creating a social stigma where individuals from high-socioeconomic households tend to succeed academically compared to their low-socioeconomic counterparts. However, on a micro-level I have witnessed friendsRead MoreHow Does Poverty Affect Education?1036 Words   |  5 PagesBoisvert Taylor Boisvert Mrs. Spoor English 11 April 17, 2017 Poverty Research Paper Research Question: How does poverty affect Education? A child who is raised in a stressful and poverty stricken household environment is more likely to channel their stress into disruptive behavior at school and will be less likely to develop a healthy social and academic life (Bradley and Corwyn, 2002). Many say that laziness is a factor affecting education and success rate, however, it is a proven fact that getting

Policy Analysis of Australian Refugee for Asylum- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about thePolicy Analysis of Australian Refugee for Asylum Seeker. Answer: Introduction In 1951, the United Nations held the convention on refugees that Australia became sanctioned. The document described who a refugee is, their rights and the protection that is accorded to them by the other countries. The main principle states that refugees cannot be returned to their home country if they may be in danger. Meanwhile, countries are supposed to cooperate and ensure their rights are protected. This essay focuses on the analysis of the policy of those seeking asylum in Australia based on the Neoliberalism framework. It worth noting that in 1967, the protocol that removed the limitation on the convention was established making the policy universal. In the convention, a refugee is defined as a person who seeks protection from a state because they are freeing their home. These people are usually afraid of persecution because they belong to a group that is prosecuted or based on factors such as race, politics or religion. They are usually seeking assistance with the help of an international agency. On the other hand, asylum seekers are people who free their country but seek protection after they arrive at the border of other countries without a valid visa. Content analysis The analysis is framed using the neoliberalism framework. Neoliberalism supports deregulation and privatization and less government spending. According to the theory, the government is only supposed to interfere with creation then allow free trade to occur (Carson, Kerr, 2017). Paradoxically, the framework encourages the free flow of capital but restricts the movement of labor through migration. In the developing countries, globalization has negatively affected the availability of employment making citizens migrate to western states looking for a better life. Meanwhile, neoliberalism makes it difficult for these migrants to enter such states. In this case, the framework will explain the social, economic, political and historical factors affecting the implementation and development of the policy on asylum seekers. One concept of the neoliberalism framework is the externalization policy. This is a policy that was practiced by the European Union and it involved the settlement of migrants in a third country such as Turkey to prevent their entrance into the European Union. Similarly, the Australian government introduced the offshore processing policy where asylum seekers were to be processed in Papua New Guinea and Nauru. Later, the government decided to settle and process the immigrants in these countries. One of the economic factors that have affected the development of this policy is the privatization of the states services regarding migration. This is where the state privatized the running of the detention center and the processing seeking asylum especially when the offshore processing was established (Lueck, Due, Augoustinos, 2015). Under this management, seekers do not receive free advice as they did before, the living conditions have deteriorated and the refugees are afraid of insecurity. Another economic factor that contributed to the development of the policies on asylum seekers was the need for cheap labor from immigrants. This mainly occurred at the end of the second world war. Presently, the use of cheap labor is still preferred compared to the domestic labor that is more expensive. Therefore, the policys lack deterrence of immigration has negative effects on the economy in relation to cheap labor. Politically, neoliberalism has made the Australian government stop supporting itself using labor-intensive policies and switch to capital-intensive policies. This also changed the role of states in the international economic order. As a result, developing countries have become manufacturing centers in order to attract capital leading to regional migration. Domestic politics are some of the factors the factors that affect asylum seekers policy. In 1990, the government was under pressure due to the increase in the number of unlawful immigrants. The number was approximately 90,000. This led to the fear that the government was incapable of controlling its borders. Consequently, the mandatory detention policy was implemented in 1992. This was also to protect the countrys immigration program. In 1999, the government led by Howard introduced the temporary visa in an attempt to discourage asylum seekers from the middle east. People still complained despite this attempt leading to the offshore processing policy in 2001. This mainly triggered by the need to refuse entry to a ship from Norwegia. In 2007, the government under Rudd abolished the policy on offshore processing. In 2012, due to the increased number of asylum seekers, the government under Gilliard reintroduced the policy. This government also succeeded in reducing the number the number of people who had been detained for more than a year between 2011 and 2012. Socially, countries derive their national identity from shared attributes. In addition, countries protect their national identity by eliminating factors that lead to foreign influence (Brain, 2010). The protection against foreign influence can also be used to unify social groups in the country that are differing. In the asylum seekers policy, the government has used restrictive measures to reduce and stop the settlement of refugees to protect the national identity of the country. Prior to this, the governments support of multiculturism has encouraged the settlement of refugees in the region. Another social factor is the changing attitudes towards migration. In the 1990s, when the refugees arrived from Vietnam due to the war, Australians were sympathetic and quickly resettled them. Australians were against the regime that ruled in Vietnam. Therefore, the refugees were easily accepted since they shared a common enemy. During that time, refugees were given permanent residency and they were allowed to leave the detention center and return when their names were called in roll call. However, when the number of refugees increased they began to feel threatened due to the high rate of employment. Neoliberalism is centered on self-interest where states do that which is beneficial to them. Based on this, the other social factor is self-interest where the government does not care about the rights of the refugees. This is demonstrated by the detention fee that was imposed on asylum seekers after the detention centers were established. It is worth noting that debts incurred due to this policy were rarely recovered and the policy was abolished when Rudd took over. Additionally, asylum seekers that were processed in offshore detention centers did not get legal aid which was given when the processing was onshore. Historically, Australia was recognized under a white policy where the residents were white. After the second world war, asylum seekers were allowed into the country due to high demand for labor (Stratton, 2009). Moreover, they were allowed to reside in the community before the approval of their refugee status was done. In the 1970s, when the international community was experiencing economic down times, the rate of migration reduced but remained relatively high after the Fraser government accepted refugees from Vietnam. Notably, the country resettled a large number of refugees between 1975 and 1995. As the country began to embrace neoliberalism and the economy recovered from the post-war period restrictive measures on immigration were imposed as illustrated below. In 1989, detention centers were established to detain asylum seekers before their status is approved. The mandatory detention policy was later established in 1992 by the government led by Keating where asylum seekers are detained while health and security checks are done. The detainees were supposed to pay for the detention. They are also given the option to return to their countries during the waiting period. The detention is mandatory for anyone who is in the Australia illegally. In the 2000s, the offshore policy was introduced to the asylum seeker policy (Phillips Spinks, n.d.). Under this policy, asylum seekers were to be detained in Nauru and Papua New Guinea as their status was determined. Additionally, the government introduced temporary protection visa and the turning back of boats. In 2013, the Australian government decided that the processing and settlement of asylum seekers, if they are refugees, will be done in Papua New Guinea (Pickering, Weber, 2014). This policy breaches the international law on the rights of refugees according to the United Nations. This is due to the detainment of asylum seekers indefinitely under harsh living conditions in Papua New Guinea. The government has given itself the power to send back asylum seekers arriving using boats which are in violation of the convention. The policy supports the separation of families which is against the international law. Moreover, these detention centers are homes to children who undergo physical and emotional torture and abuse. Meanwhile, the government has dismissed the allegations about the policy. Descriptive analysis One of the factors that affect the implementation of the policy is the allocation of funds. In the 1980s, the state had small centers where asylum seekers went to get resettled. Over the years, the government has shifted the location of such centers with the aim of using the least amount of money. Under the leadership of Rudd, the government was able to remove offshore processing and allow advice to be given to asylum seekers in the detention camps. As a result, the number of arrivals increased between 2009 and 2010. The government also increased the budget allocation for the migration program to approximately $ 200 million which involved expenses and upgrading funds. This shows that the funds allocated determined services offered by the government under the migration program. Presently, the government is spending a lot on the management of the offshore processing centers. In the budget of 2015 to 2016, it allocated around $800 million to the project. Within two years, it added $ 340 million to the budget. In 2016 and 2017, the estimated sending is expected to reach at least $ 1 billion. Evidently, privatization has its own disadvantages. An analysis of the offshore centers between 2012 and 2016 revealed that the number of asylum seekers between July 2013 and April 2014. Afterward, the trend has been declining and the number of asylum seekers in September 2016 was below 1500. Based the nationality of the asylum seekers, the majority were from Iran and they went to the center in Papua New Guinea. The centers had the largest number of children seeking asylum between 2013 and 2014. Later on, the trend has declined in a similar manner as the trend of the total number of those seeking asylum. In 2014, the number of arrivals was 889 and the number of departures of refugees to their original countries was 303. This means the rate of departure to arrival was 34 percent. In 2015, there were 63 departures with no arrivals ("Australias offshore processing of asylum seekers in Nauru and PNG: a quick guide to statistics and resources", 2016). Interpretative analysis The purpose of this information is to explore the factors that contributed to the implementation and development of the policy. The information provides an understanding that can be used to find ways to improve the policy. The information can be used by those that are opposing the current policy to find new ways of advocating for its abolishment. The essay also looks at the effects of the current policy. Based on the analysis, the current policy has succeeded in lowering the number of those seeking asylum in the country. However, it has increased the violation of the rights of refugees, especially in the offshore detention centers. Discourse analysis The language used in the policy development is authoritative. It is expressed by the officials in the government. It is characterized by words such as the issuance of a permanent protection visa, regional processing arrangements and policy dilemmas. Authoritative language is mainly used by people who have the power to control something or make decisions. The language used showed that the officials have a lot of knowledge about the policymaking process and factors that affect it in Australia. In some cases, the officials used authoritarian language when they were addressing the deterrence on the immigration program. Conclusion In conclusion, the policy on those seeking asylum in Australia is a controversial issue. This is because of the contrasting perspectives of the United Nations and the Australian government. The Australian government is practicing neoliberalism through deterrence of migration. On the other hand, the United Nation expects it to protect the rights of refugees. Evidently, the policy is violating their rights but it also needs to protect its national interest. The easier solution is an approach that is able to cater for the countrys national interests while protecting the rights of refugees. References Australias offshore processing of asylum seekers in Nauru and PNG: a quick guide to statistics and resources. (2016).Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 11 October 2017, from https://About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1617/Quick_Guides/Offshore Brain, M. (2010). Governing the Market: Threats to Australia's Stability and Security.National Economic Review, 30-34. Carson, D., Kerr, N. (2017).Australian social policy and the human services. Cambridge University Press. Lueck, G., Due, E., Augoustinos, A. (2015). Neoliberalism and nationalism: Representations of asylum seekers in the Australian mainstream news media.Discourse Society, 609-626. Phillips, J., Spinks, H.Immigration detention in Australia.Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 11 October 2017. Pickering, D., Weber, K. (2014). New Deterrence Scripts in Australia's Rejuvenated Offshore Detention Regime for Asylum Seekers.Law Social Inquiry, 1007-1024. Stratton, M. (2009). Uncertain lives: migration, the border and neoliberalism in Australia.Social Identities,678-690.